Sen. Hirono: “Guess who's perpetuating all of these kinds of actions? It's the men in this country. I just want to say to the men in this country, just shut up! And step up. Do the right thing for a change.” pic.twitter.com/IvLGAQfH7W
— MSNBC (@MSNBC) September 18, 2018
This Brett Kavanaugh vs. “college professor WE MUST BELIEVE” tussle is the latest American flamethrower.
Should our high school horndog moments haunt us 35 years later?
YES! If they involve sexual abuse, lack of consent, or radiating pain for a victim.
NO! If it’s a thinly-veiled political stunt to ruin someone’s life.
Liberals demand that WE BELIEVE WOMEN unless they are conservative women accusing, say, Bill Clinton. Do any of these people who automatically believe Kavanaugh’s accuser put the same blind faith into rape and sexual abuse claims by Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Juanita Broderick, or other accusers of Clinton?
But that’s old news. How about this week’s double standard of Liberal inability to recognize Liberal sexual and/or violent abusers?
As accusations of sexual misconduct weigh on the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings, “how can Democrats explain a very obvious double standard in outrage?” @secupp, @chriscquinn and @mattklewis discuss. pic.twitter.com/m6MPGkmrvG
— SE Cupp Unfiltered (@UnfilteredSE) September 22, 2018
I’m concerned that Brett Kavanaugh and his supporters have something to hide. Why not have the FBI investigate? Why not accommodate Dr. Ford as she spends her days with the FBI dealing with death threats and protecting her family? It’s one day. Why the rush? Why the bullying?
— Sen Dianne Feinstein (@SenFeinstein) September 22, 2018
A few days ago, the attorney for professor Christine Blasey Ford made a clear legal decision that her client was ready to testify before the Kavanaugh SCOTUS rush chairman and his stooges.
This is from yesterday.@SavannahGuthrie: “Is your client willing to testify before the JudiciaryCommittee publicly & tell this story?”
Debra Katz (attorney for Christine Ford): “She is. She’s willing to do whatever it takes to get her story forth. Yes.”pic.twitter.com/sY1Tb9AyDs
— Jeremiah Stephan Dunleavy IV (@JerryDunleavy) September 19, 2018
That same attorney was seen on an ABC News clip last year declaring that she would “resist” the Trump administration. Hmmm…she seems like an impartial woman with no ax to grind.
Katz is now demanding a full FBI investigation before she can testify. Sen. Diane Feinstein was not forthcoming about Blasey Ford’s accusation during her private senate meeting with Kavanaugh, leading to speculation that the entire saga is just a political stunt to delay the nomination process.
Katz hates Trump. Katz’s client wants to derail a Trump supreme court nominee.
New statement from Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyer, Lisa Banks: pic.twitter.com/Epa2ADXRny
— MJ Lee (@mj_lee) September 19, 2018
What it looks like when you think with your lady parts instead of your lady smarts ==>#BelieveEvidenceNotGender https://t.co/XO1pkDcMMF
— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) September 19, 2018
Due process? What kind of chicanery are you suggesting, you, you, you…MAN!
"We're dealing with the imperative we've understood culturally to take women's accounts seriously —that has not been done historically— compared to … another fundamental principle, which is an assumption of innocence on the part of someone being accused"
—@JohnAvlon pic.twitter.com/CO5t0XPRTh— New Day (@NewDay) September 19, 2018
There are some gaping holes in the fluctuating story of Christine Blasey Ford. What year? Where? Who was there?
But I am a man. I will refrain from commenting since men are supposed to STAY IN YOUR LANE on issues that involve women. Don’t mind the rest of us. Carry on with your partisan meltdown.
I’ll just stay over here playing backgammon with Merrick Garland.